Tolstoy: Anarşizm mi, Süregiden Felsefe mi?

dc.contributor.authorTümkaya, Ahmet Selim
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Cengiz Mesut
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-04T08:36:34Z
dc.date.available2020-11-04T08:36:34Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.departmentMeslek Yüksek Okuluen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we criticize a well-known remark in the anarchist literature, i.e., ‘Tolstoy, the Anarchist’, and we claim that this naming is, in fact, an oxymoron. As a theory having related itself to many movements throughout its historical development, anarchism presents considerable uncertainties in its theoretical structure that formed within the process. And as far as Tolstoy is concerned, even some of its proponents reject the claim that he was an anarchist. Departing from Albert Melzer’s view on Tolstoy, this paper tries to show that Meltzer was right in claiming that Tolstoy ‘had never been an anarchist’. In addition to these criticisms coming from the anarchist movement itself, this rejection is mainly grounded in the traditional roots of the concept of an ‘ideal’ religion, a religion of love that would encompass all humanity. When taken into consideration, these traditional roots to which Tolstoy devoted all his life intellectually and spiritually must bring him closer to the Perennial Philosophy; as a result, we claim that Tolstoy must be viewed as a ‘perennialist’ rather than an ‘anarchisen_US
dc.identifier.citationTümkaya, Ahmet Selim, Tosun, Cengiz Mesut.(2020).Tolstoy: Anarşizm mi, Süregiden Felsefe mi?.B e y t u l h i k m e A n I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f P h i l o s o p h y,10(2),639-662.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.18491/beytulhikme.1581
dc.identifier.endpage662en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage639en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid378331
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12507/1472
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000546890100012
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isotr
dc.relation.ispartofB e y t u l h i k m e A n I n t e r n a t i o n a l J o u r n a l o f P h i l o s o p h y
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTolstoyen_US
dc.subjectAnarchismen_US
dc.subjectreligionen_US
dc.subjectperennial philosophyen_US
dc.subjectGoden_US
dc.titleTolstoy: Anarşizm mi, Süregiden Felsefe mi?
dc.title.alternativeTolstoy: Anarchism or Perennial Philosophy
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
BEYTÜL HİKME TOLSTOY JUNE 2020.pdf
Boyut:
262.87 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: