Mirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the United States
dc.authorid | alola, andrew/0000-0001-5355-3707 | |
dc.contributor.author | Alola, Andrew Adewale | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozturk, Ilhan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-07T20:12:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-07T20:12:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.department | Çağ Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | In reality, economic expansion cannot be paced-up enough. This account for a potential trade-off between income and environmental degradation that is expectedly feasible at a maximum level of income. On this note, the current study looked at the validity of income-environmental degradation (Environmental Kuznets Curve, EKC) hypothesis especially amidst risk to investment in the United States over the period 1984-2017. Considering that the burning of fossil fuels constitutes the largest source of Greenhouse gas (GHG) in the United States, this study employed energy carbon emissions as a proxy for environmental quality and as a dependent variable. While the study employed renewable energy production as additional explanatory variable, it implemented the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) technique in addition to a set of cointegration techniques. Importantly, the study found that the EKC hypothesis is valid for the case of the United States but not without a non-significant trade-off of risk to investment. Additionally, renewable energy production exhibits a statistically significant and desirable impact on environmental quality in both the short and long-run. In general, the study posited that while environmental sustainability is achievable at maximum level of income, it is likely attainable at the detriment of risk to investment. Hence, this observation should trigger a potential policy mechanism that minimizes risk to investment in light of the attainment of the country's sustainable development goals (SDGs). | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112890 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0301-4797 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1095-8630 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34082348 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85107079864 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112890 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12507/2817 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 293 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000677850200003 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Academic Press Ltd- Elsevier Science Ltd | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Environmental Management | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_WoS_20241226 | |
dc.subject | Investment risk | |
dc.subject | Risk to investment led-EKC | |
dc.subject | Environmental sustainability | |
dc.subject | United States | |
dc.title | Mirroring risk to investment within the EKC hypothesis in the United States | |
dc.type | Article |